This Post
PermalinkURI
URI Label
Revisions
Export:
XML (With Files)
PNG Image
Archives
April 2013 (2)October 2012 (2)
September 2012 (6)
August 2012 (22)
July 2012 (20)
June 2012 (4)
May 2012 (21)
April 2012 (12)
March 2012 (22)
February 2012 (19)
January 2012 (27)
December 2011 (7)
November 2011 (12)
October 2011 (16)
September 2011 (5)
March 2011 (3)
February 2011 (8)
August 2010 (3)
July 2010 (5)
June 2010 (14)
May 2010 (3)
Sections
Compound Index (2)Experiments (215)
Ongoing Experiments (16)
Mnr
11-20 (4)41-50 (15)
1-10 (4)
21-30 (2)
Sc
1-10 (5)Tools
Show/Hide QR CodeShow/Hide Keys
3. Step: Preparation of a strong achiral Brønstedt-acid, intended for determination and optimization of the reaction conditions for the acid-catalyzed Pictet-Spengler reaction [1,2]
See also:
1. Step: Preparation of the starting material -> see MW45-1
2. Step: Preparation of 1,1-Binaphthyl-2,2-disulfonate -> see MW45-2
Hazard and Risk Assessment:
Reaction Class: 2
Hazards: C Corrosive, O Oxidizing agent
Risk rating: U = Unlikely
Note: Performic acid has a potential explosive hazard if it comes in contact with metals or their salts and is highly explosive in concentrated form!
MW45-3:
Start time: 7:00 PM 09/08/2010
End time: 10:10 PM 09/08/2010
Procedure: Modification of [2]
30% aq. H2O2 (700 µl) was added to formic acid (7.0 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. A solution of MW45-2 (50 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (1 mL) was added dropwise to the formic acid solution and stirred for another 2 h.
Work-Up:
- quenched with 6 N HCl (5 mL), aqueous layer extracted with chloroform and ethyl acetate
-> 1H NMR: no or only traces of product
-> compound couldn’t extracted from the aqueous layer?
MW45-3a:
Repeated procedure of MW45-3:
- 30% aq. H2O2 (700 µl) was added to formic acid (7.0 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature.
- added a solution of MW45-2 (50 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (1 mL) dropwise and stirred for 2 h.
Work-Up:
- added water (3 mL) to the mixture: colorless solid precipitated
- the mixture was evaporated carefully under reduced pressure and the remaining water was removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene (3 times 5 mL).
-> 1H NMR: undefined aromatic signals
-> decomposition of the product due to a too long reaction time?
MW45-3b:
Start time: 4:10 PM 11/08/2010
End time: 5:40 PM 11/08/2010
Repeated procedure of MW45-3:
- 30% aq. H2O2 (700 µl) was added to formic acid (7.0 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature.
- added a solution of MW45-2 (50 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (1 mL) dropwise and stirred for 30 min.
Work-Up:
- added water (3 mL) to the mixture: colorless solid precipitated
- the mixture was evaporated carefully under reduced pressure and the remaining water was removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene (3 times 5 mL).
-> 1H NMR: product with impurities, signals match with the 1H NMR data of reference [1]
- large peak at 2.44 ppm (12 H) -> dimethyl ammonium salt as counter ion to the sulfonate?
-> use conditions for up-scaling reaction
MW45-3c:
Start time: 6:10 PM 13/08/2010
End time: 7:30 PM 13/08/2010
Up-scaled procedure of MW45-3:
- a solution of formic acid (20 mL) and 30 % aq. H2O2 (2.0 mL) was stirred for 1 h at room temperature
- added a solution of MW45-2 (434 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (5 mL) was added dropwise and stirred for 20 min
- TLC (chloroform, 100%; stain: ceric ammonium molybdate) showed a complete consumption of the starting material after 15 min
- quenched with water (15 mL): pale yellow precipitate
- mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure and remaining water was removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene (3 times 5 mL).
-> yellow solid (448 mg)
-> 1H NMR showed a complete and selective conversion to the disulfonic acid / sulfonate, (1H NMR matches with date from reference [1]), but still one singulett peak at 2.55 pm (12H) – dimethyl ammonium something...
- small impurities of side products could removed by dissolving the residue in hot chloroform which obtained a pale yellow solid (407 mg), but still the deprotonated sulfonate with a ammonium counter ion
2. Work-up:
- using a Amberlite IR-120H ion exchange resin to protonate the sulfonate
- dissolved salt in MeOH/H2O (1:1) and passed it through a column of Amberlite IR-120H
- evaporate resulting solution and remove water by azeotropic distillation with toluene
References:
[1] “Pyridinium 1,1′-Binaphthyl-2,2′-disulfonates as Highly Effective Chiral Brønsted Acid−Base Combined Salt Catalysts for Enantioselective Mannich-Type Reaction”, M. Hatano, T. Maki, K. Moriyama, M. Arinobe and K. Ishihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16858–16860; DOI: 10.1021/ja806875c.
[2] “A Powerful Chiral Counteranion Motif for Asymmetric Catalysis”, P. García-García, F. Lay, P. García-García, C. Rabalakos, B. List, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4363 –4366; DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901768.
Procedure from the reference: [2]
(R)-3,3'-Bis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,1'-binaphthyl-2,2'-disulfonic acid (3): A performic acid solution was prepared by mixing and stirring 30% H2O2 (7.01 mL, 69.6 mmol) and formic acid (70 mL) at room temperature for 1 h. To this solution S-thiocarbamte 13 (2.05 g, 2.32 mmol) in 35 mL dichloromethane was added dropwise. After stirring for 3 h, the solution was filtered over a pad of silica. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to furnish the crude product which was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using dichloromethane/methanol (20/1) as eluent.
The resulting Na-salt was dissolved in dichloromethane and washed with 6N HCl. Remaining water traces were removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene to yield 3 (1.57g, 81% yield).
See also:
1. Step: Preparation of the starting material -> see MW45-1
2. Step: Preparation of 1,1-Binaphthyl-2,2-disulfonate -> see MW45-2
Reaction Scheme
Table1
Hazard and Risk Assessment:
Reaction Class: 2
Hazards: C Corrosive, O Oxidizing agent
Risk rating: U = Unlikely
Note: Performic acid has a potential explosive hazard if it comes in contact with metals or their salts and is highly explosive in concentrated form!
MW45-3:
Start time: 7:00 PM 09/08/2010
End time: 10:10 PM 09/08/2010
Procedure: Modification of [2]
30% aq. H2O2 (700 µl) was added to formic acid (7.0 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. A solution of MW45-2 (50 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (1 mL) was added dropwise to the formic acid solution and stirred for another 2 h.
Work-Up:
- quenched with 6 N HCl (5 mL), aqueous layer extracted with chloroform and ethyl acetate
-> 1H NMR: no or only traces of product
-> compound couldn’t extracted from the aqueous layer?
MW45-3a:
Repeated procedure of MW45-3:
- 30% aq. H2O2 (700 µl) was added to formic acid (7.0 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature.
- added a solution of MW45-2 (50 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (1 mL) dropwise and stirred for 2 h.
Work-Up:
- added water (3 mL) to the mixture: colorless solid precipitated
- the mixture was evaporated carefully under reduced pressure and the remaining water was removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene (3 times 5 mL).
-> 1H NMR: undefined aromatic signals
-> decomposition of the product due to a too long reaction time?
MW45-3b:
Start time: 4:10 PM 11/08/2010
End time: 5:40 PM 11/08/2010
Repeated procedure of MW45-3:
- 30% aq. H2O2 (700 µl) was added to formic acid (7.0 mL) and stirred for 1 h at room temperature.
- added a solution of MW45-2 (50 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (1 mL) dropwise and stirred for 30 min.
Work-Up:
- added water (3 mL) to the mixture: colorless solid precipitated
- the mixture was evaporated carefully under reduced pressure and the remaining water was removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene (3 times 5 mL).
-> 1H NMR: product with impurities, signals match with the 1H NMR data of reference [1]
- large peak at 2.44 ppm (12 H) -> dimethyl ammonium salt as counter ion to the sulfonate?
-> use conditions for up-scaling reaction
MW45-3c:
Start time: 6:10 PM 13/08/2010
End time: 7:30 PM 13/08/2010
Up-scaled procedure of MW45-3:
- a solution of formic acid (20 mL) and 30 % aq. H2O2 (2.0 mL) was stirred for 1 h at room temperature
- added a solution of MW45-2 (434 mg, 109 µmol) in DCM (5 mL) was added dropwise and stirred for 20 min
- TLC (chloroform, 100%; stain: ceric ammonium molybdate) showed a complete consumption of the starting material after 15 min
- quenched with water (15 mL): pale yellow precipitate
- mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure and remaining water was removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene (3 times 5 mL).
-> yellow solid (448 mg)
-> 1H NMR showed a complete and selective conversion to the disulfonic acid / sulfonate, (1H NMR matches with date from reference [1]), but still one singulett peak at 2.55 pm (12H) – dimethyl ammonium something...
- small impurities of side products could removed by dissolving the residue in hot chloroform which obtained a pale yellow solid (407 mg), but still the deprotonated sulfonate with a ammonium counter ion
2. Work-up:
- using a Amberlite IR-120H ion exchange resin to protonate the sulfonate
- dissolved salt in MeOH/H2O (1:1) and passed it through a column of Amberlite IR-120H
- evaporate resulting solution and remove water by azeotropic distillation with toluene
References:
[1] “Pyridinium 1,1′-Binaphthyl-2,2′-disulfonates as Highly Effective Chiral Brønsted Acid−Base Combined Salt Catalysts for Enantioselective Mannich-Type Reaction”, M. Hatano, T. Maki, K. Moriyama, M. Arinobe and K. Ishihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16858–16860; DOI: 10.1021/ja806875c.
[2] “A Powerful Chiral Counteranion Motif for Asymmetric Catalysis”, P. García-García, F. Lay, P. García-García, C. Rabalakos, B. List, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4363 –4366; DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901768.
Procedure from the reference: [2]
(R)-3,3'-Bis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-1,1'-binaphthyl-2,2'-disulfonic acid (3): A performic acid solution was prepared by mixing and stirring 30% H2O2 (7.01 mL, 69.6 mmol) and formic acid (70 mL) at room temperature for 1 h. To this solution S-thiocarbamte 13 (2.05 g, 2.32 mmol) in 35 mL dichloromethane was added dropwise. After stirring for 3 h, the solution was filtered over a pad of silica. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to furnish the crude product which was subjected to silica gel column chromatography using dichloromethane/methanol (20/1) as eluent.
The resulting Na-salt was dissolved in dichloromethane and washed with 6N HCl. Remaining water traces were removed by azeotropic distillation with toluene to yield 3 (1.57g, 81% yield).
Attached Files
Reaction Scheme
Table1